<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Merrell . com &#187; C# ASP.NET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelmerrell.com/category/web-development/c-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelmerrell.com</link>
	<description>This website is devoted to web development and my technology opinions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:57:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Global Error logging in MVC or ASP .NET using C#</title>
		<link>http://michaelmerrell.com/2010/04/global-error-logging-in-mvc-or-asp-net-using-c/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michaelmerrell.com/2010/04/global-error-logging-in-mvc-or-asp-net-using-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 04:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Merrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C# ASP.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entity Framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Error Handling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Error Logging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Error Table]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MVC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelmerrell.com/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the implementation of MVC there is a lot more room for unhanded global exceptions because in MVC you are encouraged to write more in line code to accompany the back end code. So what happens when an exception is thrown within the front end code? Well you&#8217;ll have an exception that will bubble up <a href='http://michaelmerrell.com/2010/04/global-error-logging-in-mvc-or-asp-net-using-c/'>[Read More...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelmerrell.com/2010/04/global-error-logging-in-mvc-or-asp-net-using-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dynamically modifying the ASP.NET GridView paging control.</title>
		<link>http://michaelmerrell.com/2010/01/dynamically-modifying-the-asp-net-gridview-paging-control/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michaelmerrell.com/2010/01/dynamically-modifying-the-asp-net-gridview-paging-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Merrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C# ASP.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GridView]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelmerrell.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently we had a client ask us to add a label in front of the paging control on an ASP.NET gridview numeric paging control so that users would know what the numbers meant. This seemed like a reasonable request as we were dealing with users who may not be the most tech savvy, plus it <a href='http://michaelmerrell.com/2010/01/dynamically-modifying-the-asp-net-gridview-paging-control/'>[Read More...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelmerrell.com/2010/01/dynamically-modifying-the-asp-net-gridview-paging-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looping through Multiple Repeaters</title>
		<link>http://michaelmerrell.com/2009/10/looping-through-multiple-repeaters/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://michaelmerrell.com/2009/10/looping-through-multiple-repeaters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Merrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C# ASP.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Item Collections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Looping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repeaters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelmerrell.com/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was struggling with how exactly to go about looping through both item collections without having to duplicate the same piece of functionality. My original idea was to create a for each loop that went through both repeaters item collections, but in C# .NET it is not possible to have a single for each loop go through multiple parent objects. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://michaelmerrell.com/2009/10/looping-through-multiple-repeaters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

